3 ms·

Oh no, bare breasts, how awful!

• jimbokun 3y ago
  Without consent of the person whose face was attached to those breasts.
• yareal 3y ago
  Bodies are bodies, nudity is no big deal. But someone should have the ability to decide how their body is depicted. Someone should be able to say, "I'm not comfortable baring my breasts." And we should be ok with that. Consent matters.
  • ta1243 3y ago
    The person consented to put their face on a scene of some sort. Given the majority of people on a beach are topless selecting what would life be like if I could take a holiday" doesn't sound shocking that it shows you.
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    • nozzlegear 3y ago
      I’d love to see your numbers for the “majority of people on a beach” being topless, because outside of places in Europe I don’t think it’s going to shake out quite as overwhelmingly as you seem to think. And since we’re talking about someone from Washington state in the first place, it’s certainly not the norm there.
      • yareal 3y ago
        Toplessness, interestingly, is not illegal in Washington. And if the parent poster is including male toplessness, it's possible that some breaches are at times majority topless. The rest of their argument is rubbish, of course, but it's kinda funny that they right in that "broken clock" sort of way a little bit.
• deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
• roywiggins 3y ago
  "I don't see the problem, you asked for a quick cartoon sketch of yourself, and I gave you one back with the big bare breasts that I imagine you have. Why are you mad? What prudery! I am an artist!"
  • ta1243 3y ago
    I can think of a hundred things that would be more offensive
    • roywiggins 3y ago
      And your personal scale of offensiveness is definitely universally shared by everyone [0], which I am sure makes product development much simpler. [0] and anyone who disagrees is, of course, at best a prude