3 ms·

I'm following this thread and still don't understand what you think "enough" is. The person you are replying to makes sense to me. This is just a fyi when try

• Dylan16807 3y ago
  That is because I have not given a definition for it. I don't have a specific one in mind. I just think "100% of surplus value" is a wrong definition, so using that definition to argue that "in a very literal sense, pay can never be enough" is a very flawed argument. I don't think I need to offer my own definition to claim that, do I? They later said it's subjective, which seems to favor my claim. Does that clear things up? Is there a reason you thought I was trying to give a definition, and failing? Is there something wrong with my argument?
  • mlrtime 3y ago
    I was just trying to follow the conversation which I felt was more interesting than the amazon story.