4 ms·
12% is a very very large number for that kind of problem. I doubt even 0.1% of bug reports in the wild are that well written.
by aiauthoritydev2 3y ago
12% is a very very large number for that kind of problem. I doubt even 0.1% of bug reports in the wild are that well written.
- littlestymaar 3y agoExcept this is automated, so you could get multiples orders of magnitude more bug filled, so you need to have a very low false positive ratio to avoid being overwhelmed by automatically generated crap (which is basically spam).
- sitkack 3y agoHave the LLM rewrite the bug reports.
- killingtime74 3y agoWhy not have LLM write AGI while you're at it
- sitkack 3y agoIt is and it will!
- fasa99 3y agoYou'd want three LLMs, one to create the bugs, one to report it, one to fix it. I joke of course but on the other hand this is potentially a worthwhile architecture from a self-training perspective - a bug-creating LLM means your training set size is as big as you want it +/- GAN features.