4 ms·
Well, the article also says that the plane isn't even owned by the company but by the CEOs family holding. So even if it's "a drop in the bucket", it's also no
by pjerem 3y ago
Well, the article also says that the plane isn't even owned by the company but by the CEOs family holding.
So even if it's "a drop in the bucket", it's also not really a company expense, just an outrageous compensation.
- disgruntledphd2 3y agoI think that makes it worse, tbh. Like the guy already has a jet, which presumably he can afford to run. Taking money out of an unprofitable company to pay for (somewhat) unreasonable personal expenses kinda feels off to me. But then, maybe I'd feel differently if I had a private jet ;)