3 ms·
> [libc and the kernel] currently have a much better guaranteed quality than systemd, What are you basing that on?
by Karellen 3y ago
> [libc and the kernel] currently have a much better guaranteed quality than systemd,
What are you basing that on?
- marcosdumay 3y agoHistorical behavior. There doesn't exist anything else this could be based on.
- Karellen 3y agoDoes systemd have a historical record of its defect rate being significantly greater than that of the kernel/glibc? I just checked Coverity scans, and the most recent defect densities appear to be: kernel : 0.59 glibc : 0.54 systemd: 0.04 which actually looks pretty good for systemd. Is there some other analysis you're basing this off? Or are the current rates atypical, and systemd used to be a lot worse? https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux https://scan.coverity.com/projects/gnu-c-library-glibc https://scan.coverity.com/projects/gnu-c-library-glibc https://scan.coverity.com/projects/systemd https://scan.coverity.com/projects/systemd