2 ms·
It’s not pornographic. There’s not even nudity in it. Is David a pornographic statue too?
by _3u10 3y ago
It’s not pornographic. There’s not even nudity in it. Is David a pornographic statue too?
- shlubbert 3y agoIt's referencing an image created with pornographic intent. This is not that difficult, come on.
- jonhohle 3y agoModern relativists feign ignorance regarding the cost of what was almost universally regarded as societally harmful. It’s literally regressive behavior making decisions purely on the basest chemical responses and emotion and not higher order thinking, reasoning or logic. And then somehow bundling that up and claiming to be enlightened.
- mort96 3y agoI don't know who David is. But in case it helps: not all nudity is pornographic, and not all non-nudity is non-pornographic.
- copperx 3y agoIt is a nude, pornographic image that has been cropped. Cropping doesn't change the original intent.