3 ms·
Pornographic images are generally considered unprofessional in settings outside of the sex work industry. It's wild that this even has to be spelled out but he
by mort96 3y ago
Pornographic images are generally considered unprofessional in settings outside of the sex work industry.
It's wild that this even has to be spelled out but here we are.
- _3u10 3y agoIt’s not pornographic. There’s not even nudity in it. Is David a pornographic statue too?
- shlubbert 3y agoIt's referencing an image created with pornographic intent. This is not that difficult, come on.
- jonhohle 3y agoModern relativists feign ignorance regarding the cost of what was almost universally regarded as societally harmful. It’s literally regressive behavior making decisions purely on the basest chemical responses and emotion and not higher order thinking, reasoning or logic. And then somehow bundling that up and claiming to be enlightened.
- mort96 3y agoI don't know who David is. But in case it helps: not all nudity is pornographic, and not all non-nudity is non-pornographic.
- copperx 3y agoIt is a nude, pornographic image that has been cropped. Cropping doesn't change the original intent.
- bawolff 3y agoI think its debatable whether the cropped image is pornagraphic. The original situation when the image was scanned was certainly inapropriate. But i think its a jump to describe the cropped version as pornagraphic. Whether something is pornagraphic depends on context. Cropped and removed from the original context i fail to see how it is still porn. It seems like the argument is because its origin is porn, everything associated with it is porn. This seems like a very dangerous argument and a very slippery slope.
- johnea 3y agoThe photo is not pornographic...
- mort96 3y agoThe photo is here: https://womenlovetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/distressed-lena-image-1-scaled.jpg https://womenlovetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/distres... Make up your own god damn mind, but it's pretty clearly pornographic to me.