>Even after that, you were still insisting there were loopholes. After clarifying my position, I figured you'd either reply with "yes, we were on different wav

>Even after that, you were still insisting there were loopholes. After clarifying my position, I figured you'd either reply with "yes, we were on different wavelengths" or you'd accept we were talking about possession. So when you continued, I assumed you were talking about possession too. My mistake.