3 ms·
Yes. The "record" part, is beside the point. * Most people are unaware of the scale of disproportionality at all. * The average income of Americans has not sc
by Supermancho 3y ago
Yes. The "record" part, is beside the point.
* Most people are unaware of the scale of disproportionality at all.
* The average income of Americans has not scaled at the same rate.
* What kind of (purchasing) power that is at odds with any sort of social reform.
There is an implication that US capitalism has bred what economic models always do. A caste system.
You can't expect the content of an article to be summarized completely in a short title, or this response. I have not summarized the article either, just some casual implications. There's an expectation that you read about the article to understand the context, but I can understand not wanting to read a CNBC article.
- refurb 3y ago> Yes. The "record" part, is beside the point. If it's besides the point why make it the headline? > Most people are unaware of the scale of disproportionality at all The biggest issue is that the top 1% is not a static group! People move into it and out of it all the time - the churn is quite high. There was an analysis of US tax payers and most people will only enter the top 1% for one year out of their entire life.