3 ms·

How would having 99 counterfeit stamps violate that law? I think you/the other person (assuming that's what their question meant) took it as "each page printed

How would having 99 counterfeit stamps violate that law? I think you/the other person (assuming that's what their question meant) took it as "each page printed only has 99, but they're still printing multiple pages per run" while I meant "each run has 99 stamps, then they distribute them." edit or you think the law could be based on how many counterfeit stamps they had made, not possession. Dunno, we're really spending too much time attacking my bullshit hypothetical that was meant to say "make it hard for the law to have a loophole."

Dylan16807 3y ago
> each run has 99 stamps, then they distribute them In that case they're not making much money per batch and they have to only ever get caught once in their life, so it's not much difference to them, it only makes a significant difference to someone that isn't mass-producing stamps. > Dunno, we're really spending too much time attacking my bullshit hypothetical that was meant to say "make it hard for the law to have a loophole." Well I don't think the original had any loopholes, which is why I'm pushing back on your attempt to say that by pointing out a loophole.
- boomboomsubban 3y ago
  The original or real law considers counterfeiting one stamp a crime, which I think is fine. I took issue with somebody criticizing that law by saying only counterfeiting one stamp shouldn't be a crime. So I pointed out that if you made some arbitrary non-one number the breaking point you're opening up loopholes. I'm not trying to introduce loopholes, the law is what it is to prevent loopholes. And the ridiculousness of counterfeiting one stamp being a felony is avoided by not prosecuting anyone who only counterfeits one stamp.
  - Dylan16807 3y ago
    By "original" I mean coldtea's suggesting that counterfeiting "_a_ stamp" should not be a "serious federal felony". You're suggesting a lot of loopholes that don't work.

Dylan16807 3y ago

> each run has 99 stamps, then they distribute them In that case they're not making much money per batch and they have to only ever get caught once in their life, so it's not much difference to them, it only makes a significant difference to someone that isn't mass-producing stamps. > Dunno, we're really spending too much time attacking my bullshit hypothetical that was meant to say "make it hard for the law to have a loophole." Well I don't think the original had any loopholes, which is why I'm pushing back on your attempt to say that by pointing out a loophole.

boomboomsubban 3y ago
The original or real law considers counterfeiting one stamp a crime, which I think is fine. I took issue with somebody criticizing that law by saying only counterfeiting one stamp shouldn't be a crime. So I pointed out that if you made some arbitrary non-one number the breaking point you're opening up loopholes. I'm not trying to introduce loopholes, the law is what it is to prevent loopholes. And the ridiculousness of counterfeiting one stamp being a felony is avoided by not prosecuting anyone who only counterfeits one stamp.
- Dylan16807 3y ago
  By "original" I mean coldtea's suggesting that counterfeiting "_a_ stamp" should not be a "serious federal felony". You're suggesting a lot of loopholes that don't work.