2 ms·
People will say this happened before with people purposefully doing this, but it will happen at a much faster rate with much less oversight with AI. Moreover, I
by vouaobrasil 3y ago
People will say this happened before with people purposefully doing this, but it will happen at a much faster rate with much less oversight with AI. Moreover, I can't help but think of the comments both Garry Kasparov and Go players made when they were playing against AI: they thought it had very counterintuitive and confusing moves compared to human play.
The truth is, while both humans and AI can make errors, and both can be malicious as well, the actions of AI will be counterintuitive and confusing and we won't know how to counter them in the same way that we counter human follies.
This is just one aspect that shows that AI is making society worse on average and it should be destroyed.
- ben_w 3y ago"Malice" is, at present, as much of an anthropomorphisation as calling it "good"; you could ask it to play a malicious role, and it will do so, but it is not so by itself. The output of AI can often be confusing, yes, and indeed this is part of the issue Yudkowsky has with AI in general: we can't predict it in detail, especially not in domains where it out-performs us (like Chess). However, this is tangential to any question about "making society worse" — even when it's making society better (because it's more capable than we are at something which we care about), Yudkowsky would caution that this may be a 5D chess move to gain more power.