5 ms·
Depressing, perhaps, if you're part of the nobility. Heartening, perhaps, of you're one of the workers building the palaces of revelry but never getting to enjo
by pbhjpbhj 3y ago
Depressing, perhaps, if you're part of the nobility. Heartening, perhaps, of you're one of the workers building the palaces of revelry but never getting to enjoy them.
Essentially, society is highly inequitable, instability is to be expected and is probably only a negative if you're living it up. If you're part of the higher classes gaining rent -- in any form -- from others needs then you'd probably want this 'empire' to live for ever.
Under it all lies greed, and over-population.
- lupusreal 3y agoIf you think America's administrative competency crisis will make things better for workers, I'd like some of what you're smoking.
- OfficeChad 3y ago[dead]
- FredPret 3y agoWhere do people get these class warfare talking points? Is there a new wave of teenagers discovering Das Kapital and then saying stuff like this online?
- pbhjpbhj 3y agoLol, by living in the World for more decades than a teenager. Did you have a point to make?
- dsq 3y agoI doubt one in a hundred have actually read any part of the original sources. They get what they know from fifteen second videos. This is not their fault, however. Reading long form is becoming a specialized skill.
- elzbardico 3y ago[flagged]
- FredPret 3y agoa) address the argument, not the person b) spreading class divisions is bad, and spreading generational divisions is worse, because it splits up society rather than unify us. So stop it. c) I’m a millennial
- JackMorgan 3y agoWe used to have strong unions that built a strong middle class. Now everyone's out for themselves and real wages are 1/3rd what they were for our grandparents. We have record numbers of the upper class, and fewer middle class each year. A lot of people want a middle class life and are seeing the connection between strong unified bargaining and their chances to become middle class.
- senordevnyc 3y ago[dead]
- willcipriano 3y agoOnce you get a step further than that you'll realize that unions are another mechanism used to control labor[0] and that federal reserve policy on down is designed explicitly to suppress wages[1] so really the only solution is to make politicians fear the people again. [0]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-signs-bill-block-us-railroad-strike-2022-12-02/ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-signs-bill-block-us-r... (you aren't allowed to strike beacuse it will cost people money) [1-1]eg. 2% inflation target was originally suggested as it allowed employers to not give raises and lower their employee expenses over time [1-2]eg. interest rates were only raised once wages started ticking upward after decades of stagnation and decline, inflation in every other area of the marketplace wasn't a concern and you were labeled some sort of "inflation nut" if you mentioned it [1-3] now consider trade tariffs that encourage firms to offshore, lack of immigration enforcement creating a unlimited supply of low skill labor, use of below minimum wage prison labor to dilute the power of workers not in prison, welfare programs that subsidize low wage workers who otherwise wouldn't be able to afford working for a employer and you start to think this isn't just a happy accident for the capital class that the world is arranged in this very specific way benefitting them.
- kys_now 3y ago[dead]
- FredPret 3y agoEveryone always has, and always will be, looking out for themselves. It’s biological. I agree that free markets plus free unionization can lead to great results (look at Sweden - no labour laws and strong unions and high wages). But this hankering for a catastrophically flawed social system (built-in hate for other classes?!) that depends on changing human nature and thus never works is even cringier than Ayn Rand-quoting teenagers who want no government at all.
- FrustratedMonky 3y ago"Where do people get these class warfare talking points? " There does seem to be a segment of people that aren't super rich, but are rich enough to be isolated and don't realize there is a huge number of people really struggling. They don't seem to realize 'poor' people exists. Or think they should just get a job. Typically, this class of 'bour·geoi·sie' don't realize they are benefiting from the 'class war' being waged by the super rich, and that they are actually winning.
- mlrtime 3y agoThere has always been struggle, always poor and rich. I'm on the side that things are better now than ever. Specifically with a trend line through the COVID dip that we are still recovering from. People are coming to America by the 1000's everyday because this is the best place in the world for opportunity. The super rich are not our enemies.
- ttyprintk 3y agoThose sentences are unrelated. Humanity has never needed billionaires and only in abstract theory does their existence benefit the rest.
- MikePlacid 3y ago> Humanity has never needed billionaires and only in abstract theory does their existence benefit the rest. I’ve witnessed how decisions are made in a country with no billionaires - they were made by Politburo guys. I’ve also witnessed how decisions are made by Elon Mask. I’d have Mask over Politburo every time. Billionaires are just centers of power who are not subject to the Party ideology and control. Why would anyone refuse having the power more distributed?
- FrustratedMonky 3y agoAmerica also has good Geography, farm land, rivers, peaceful boarders(despite the rhetoric), oceans for protection. And, convenient plagues upon settlement, pretty much an empty continent with all of these plentiful resources. Which caused a huge spring board effect. It's basically an entire country that has survivor bias.