3 ms·

And Meta denied that Zuckerburg was involved in Project Ghostbuster, yet here are the emails proving otherwise... When are we going to start holding CEOs (and

• deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
• pixxel 3y ago
  It’s a big club…
  • whatamidoingyo 3y ago
    ...and you ain't in it!
• Barrin92 3y ago
  >And Meta denied that Zuckerburg was involved in Project Ghostbuster, yet here are the emails proving otherwise... It seems cartoonish given the scope alone: "A team of senior executives and roughly 41 lawyers worked on Project Ghostbusters," Yep the CEO of one of the most top-down structured companies in the world with sole decision making power doesn't know what his senior executives and lawyers are doing. Either way even if he didn't know I also don't understand why responsibility and leadership seemingly don't go hand in hand in the corporate world. Imagine a military leader lost a battalion and went with "Well I don't know they ran off in that direction..."
  • fsociety 3y ago
    You are talking about Zuck’s voting shares. It’s true he has power at that level and is the ultimate say in the company. But the actual company is by a large margin the most bottoms up company, even more than 99% of startups - speaking from experience. That doesn’t excuse Onavo, or excuse Zuck’s responsibility, but want to give context on company culture.