5 ms·

Hm... might still have been better to first ask around if anyone is willing to maintain it instead of marking it as deprecated?

• the_mitsuhiko 3y ago
  From what I can tell this is a second order effect. No advisory was made against serde-yaml, it was made against rust-yaml. The maintainer of serde-yaml I believe just took the opportunity to mark it as deprecated to ensure people don't migrate there.
  • geodel 3y ago
    I'd think of it as a smart move considering how entitled, aggressive and demanding open source software users have become over maintainers.
    • tempaccount420 3y ago
      Yeah, I'm really disappointed reading the comments here. This is his project, he can do whatever he wants with it, including delete and forget about it. The author doesn't owe you anything. Just use a fork or another implementation. This isn't the end of the world.
      • IshKebab 3y ago
        > The author doesn't owe you anything. I don't think anyone is claiming he is legally required to do it. Just that it would be nice. But in this case I think he did try to look for someone anyway.
• falserum 3y ago
  Not the author, but I assume he is not against you taking over. Code is still there if you are willing. (It is not too late)
  • rob74 3y ago
    I'm not a particularly big fan of YAML either I'm afraid, so I would probably choose some other way-to-learn-rust...
• masklinn 3y ago
  He'd been looking for a serde-yaml maintainer for a while, and none ever popped up.