3 ms·
Tens of millions of freeloaders too.
by bamboozled 3y ago
Tens of millions of freeloaders too.
- rvz 3y ago...and thousands of enterprise customers translating into billions of dollars worth of deals. The point is, OpenAI can afford to have free-loaders as long as their deals from enterprise, governments are paying for the service. Midjourney doesn't have a free plan so no free-loaders there and they're making $200M+ with no VCs. Stability.ai will always suffer from free-loaders due to their fully open source AI.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> Stability.ai will always suffer from free-loaders due to their fully open source AI. Stability's recent models (SD3, SV3D, StableLM2, StableCode, and more) are neither open licensed nor planned for release as open licensed.
- bamboozled 3y agoSounds like a fairly precarious position they’re in though. This isn’t some new magic tech anymore.
- raincole 3y agoEvery single Ad blocker users is a freeloader to Google/Youtube. Didn't stop them from being extremely successful.
- necovek 3y agoI am both a Youtube Family Premium and a dedicated ad-blocker user.
- oefrha 3y agoPretty sure YouTube has been losing a lot of money every year before they very aggressively ramped up ad frequency and duration as well as subscriptions in recent years. They could only do that thanks to Google’s main cash cow; YouTube would have been dead if not acquired and subsidized by Google.
- johnnyanmac 3y agostudios are the target here, not consumers. Pareto principle applies when you need more than a passive user. 20% or less of the serious studios (which is already a minority) will end up providing 80% of the value of any given AI solution.