2 ms·
Yes, its obviously top-shelf misogyny. There's no amount of backtracking that can hide it now. Ironically, while there may be an overabundance of men in the Ba
by jeffbee 3y ago
Yes, its obviously top-shelf misogyny. There's no amount of backtracking that can hide it now.
Ironically, while there may be an overabundance of men in the Bay Area, with a particularly acute imbalance in center of the big tech industry, in Berkeley it's the other way around. Women have a +10% overrepresentation at the university, so at least numerically it is a piece of cake to find a female partner. At least, it should be for people who are normal and not creepy jerks with axes to grind.
- solenoid0937 3y agoStating obvious fact is not misogyny, just because you don't like it. 90% percent of men that have dating experience outside the Bay Area will attest to the stark difference in women's behavior, and it's definitely not a good difference. It is simple human psychology that we grow more entitled the more desirable we are. This is why balanced gender ratios are important. You can't just call people's shared experience "misogyny." Pointing out commonly and repeatedly observed behavior differences is not that.