4 ms·
Pure CSS. Invalid HTML. Nice job tho. Now just need to make it in 3D.
by somishere 3y ago
Pure CSS. Invalid HTML.
Nice job tho. Now just need to make it in 3D.
- assimpleaspossi 3y agoI wasn't going to mention the invalid HTML. Thank you for doing it.
- xp84 3y agoI thought we all agreed to ignore validity a while back when XHTML gave way to HTML5.
- pests 3y agoHow is XHTML any more valid than HTML 5?
- tredre3 3y agoXHTML had to be valid XML, that was the entire shtick. Comparatively HTML5 is very lenient in its spec. Browsers are even more lenient in their implementation.
- pests 3y agoIt has a pretty well defined spec. It's just not XML, and I think that's okay. Do you have any examples of undefined or linient rules? I'm a big fan of optional closing tags that HTML5 has. Can do stuff like: <h2> Todo List <ul> <li> Do task A <li> Do task B <p> Dear Diary, ... Almost as easy as markdown. Couldn't get this working with XML.
- userbinator 3y agoIndeed, the fact that HTML5 specified the exact way to turn any stream of bytes into a DOM means that "error" cases are really just academic/theoretical.
- archiewood 3y agoI cheated for brevity :S