3 ms·
Given the regular stories posted on HN about folks who've had some aspect of their social or other media canceled by any some SaaS company, are these companies
by sverhagen 3y ago
Given the regular stories posted on HN about folks who've had some aspect of their social or other media canceled by any some SaaS company, are these companies having many (legal) qualms as it is about canceling people without providing a good reason for it? Would be nice if they did, though...
- GauntletWizard 3y agoI'd much prefer Google cancel capriciously with solid TOS backing to it than without, but I'll complain about their double standards about what they choose to censor... Not regardless, but without a doubt, because Google will choose to selectively enforce this rule.
- YetAnotherNick 3y agoAt the very least it wouldn't be bad for PR if Google bans someone for specifically breaking a clear TOS.
- victorbjorklund 3y agoAlways gonna be greyzones. Someone with a 60 min video where everything is real except 10 sec of insignificant b-roll footage