4 ms·
Links? Also those two statements are not mutually exclusive. Errors in statistical models being called hallucinations in the past does not mean that term is n
by dartos 3y ago
Links?
Also those two statements are not mutually exclusive.
Errors in statistical models being called hallucinations in the past does not mean that term is not marketing speak for what I said earlier.
- IshKebab 3y agoHere's an example from 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRDfzjxzj3M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRDfzjxzj3M > Also those two statements are not mutually exclusive. > Errors in statistical models being called hallucinations in the past does not mean that term is not marketing speak for what I said earlier. The implicit claim was that they call this hallucination because it sounds better. In other words that some marketing people thought "what's a nicer word for 'mistakes'?" That is categorically untrue. I don't think there's any point arguing about whether or not the marketers like the use of the word "hallucinate" because neither of us has any evidence either way. Though I was also say the null hypothesis is that they're just using the standard word for it. So the onus is on you to provide some evidence that marketers came in an said "guys, make sure you say 'hallucinate'". Which I'm 99% sure has never happened.