3 ms·
He was not going into “whistleblower” testimony. He was suing Boeing for defamation And his claims were that Boeing retaliated against him for being a whistleb
by alphabettsy 3y ago
He was not going into “whistleblower” testimony.
He was suing Boeing for defamation And his claims were that Boeing retaliated against him for being a whistleblower. It might seem like the same thing, but it’s not.
And the instances promoting criminal investigation are related to the 737 probes, not the 787 that he was a whistleblower about. There no evidence his civil case was the impetus for those criminal probes.
- reactordev 3y agoOk, “private testimony against his company”… Also to say that Foo in Green is in no way connected to Foo in Blue is a farce. 737,777,787, they all share a safety process and protocol. To say he was talking about oranges when the probes are about apples when it’s all about the Grocery Store is absurd. It’s connected. May not be directly connected, but it’s connected. It’s bad management, bad practice, sus circumstances, a coverup on the left and a dead body on the right.