4 ms·
> No specific action or policy of Onlyfans is demonstrated as problematic. It mentions multiple times OnlyFans says to have a human review each video and contr
by rhcom2 3y ago
> No specific action or policy of Onlyfans is demonstrated as problematic.
It mentions multiple times OnlyFans says to have a human review each video and contrasts that with a description of a rape where the victim is repeatably saying "no" on camera.
It mentions OnlyFans being unresponsive to complaints about videos of rape.
It's also about the larger inadequacies about the laws (or lack thereof) concerning non-consensual porn.
- spacebanana7 3y agoThe complaint made about inadequacies in law is fair. > It mentions multiple times OnlyFans says to have a human review each video and contrasts that with a description of a rape where the victim is repeatably saying "no" on camera. A lot of genuine role pay porn on the internet does that, for better or worse. E.g CNC > It mentions multiple times OnlyFans says to have a human review each video and contrasts that with a description of a rape where the victim is repeatably saying "no" on camera. Manual human reviews and slow turnaround times are inseparable. Only automated systems can give quick, instant decisions. It makes sense that rape like role play videos take a while to review. If they went 6 months (or something like that) without responding there's clearly a problem, but the nature of unresponsiveness isn't defined in the article
- freejazz 3y ago>Manual human reviews and slow turnaround times are inseparable. Only automated systems can give quick, instant decisions. Being unresponsive isn't the same thing as being slow. It says unresponsive, it doesn't say slow. What basis does anyone have to jump to your take on things when the article plainly states otherwise.
- elevatedastalt 3y agoResponding to an email is also work. What if there is a long list of such emails that need responding
- spacebanana7 3y ago> Being unresponsive isn't the same thing as being slow Just double checked and it seems “responsive” can refer to either speed or presence of response. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/responsive https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/responsive > What basis does anyone have to jump to your take on things when the article plainly states otherwise Without evidence we should withhold judgment as the default position. The article doesn’t plainly state bad behaviour from the company, but it does use a lot of rhetorical devices to describe Onlyfans as bad without direct accusations. It’s almost impressive in an unethical kind of way.
- mcphage 3y ago> A lot of genuine role pay porn on the internet does that, for better or worse. E.g CNC Requiring an extra level of verification for CNC porn wouldn't be a bad thing, however.
- londons_explore 3y agoIf what is occurring is actually illegal (as your example would be), then it's out of the platforms hands. The platform then wouldn't be able to take any action unless instructed by police.
- freejazz 3y agoAre you saying only fans couldn't take down a video of a rape without being instructed by police? On what basis do you believe that to be true? Do you really think that OnlyFan's TOS and agreements with the producers on the platform do not allow OF to remove content it deems inappropriate? That'd be facially absurd.
- croes 3y agoThe platform could simply exclude videos that depict role play rape or demand additional checks to prove it's only role play.