3 ms·
Looks interesting, but I’d never adopt anything with a license like that, especially if it mixes infrastructure and source code. If my cloud provider starts t
by niemandhier 3y ago
Looks interesting, but I’d never adopt anything with a license like that, especially if it mixes infrastructure and source code.
If my cloud provider starts to get strange I can switch or just spin up my own.
If open source maintainers drop their projects I can fork.
If some for pay software gets greedy, I’ll replace it.
With Dark it looks as if my work is their hostage, unless I miss read the license of “Dark Core”.
- mst 3y agoIn the 'status update' post that's linked from the article, they acknowledge the old licensing situation won't fly and say they're trying to figure out a way forwards that keeps as much as possible open source without becoming a tasty snack for AWS. So yes, the license you read is a reason why I wouldn't touch it either, but hopefully a bit further down the line the licensing situation will change substantially and we can both update our opinions then.