2 ms·
> Most platforms would offer the core libraries and services for free as an incentive Right, as an incentive. That's exactly right. Makers of other platforms c
by simondotau 3y ago
> Most platforms would offer the core libraries and services for free as an incentive
Right, as an incentive. That's exactly right. Makers of other platforms chose a particular funding model to suit their commercial strategic environment, not because they were obligated to. Why should Apple be obligated to follow other (or even their own) prior business models?
> This is how it used to be
It really isn't. In fact this expectation of free full-featured developer tools for mainstream platforms is relatively new. https://www.itprotoday.com/windows-78/microsoft-sets-pricing-visual-studio-97 https://www.itprotoday.com/windows-78/microsoft-sets-pricing...
> Take the games industry
Sure. Remind me where I can download the free developer kit for the PlayStation 5? Remind me who I need to pay in order to distribute a PlayStation game?
- fennecbutt 3y agoWell most certainly in many cases a flat fee even annual and not a percentage. Also if I bought visual studio, MS couldn't tell me what I could make my program do, or outright refuse to let people use my program.
- int_19h 3y agoEven back when Visual Studio did cost you an arm and a leg, you didn't need it to build and distribute software for Windows. Free options were always available; you paid for the comfort. In fact, Windows itself came with everything that you needed to build just about any userspace app in the box since Windows XP SP1 (the first one that included .NET Framework).