3 ms·

This still tells me practically nothing and answers zero of my questions, which really are genuine. I never really get a good rubric for me to determine if a fo

This still tells me practically nothing and answers zero of my questions, which really are genuine. I never really get a good rubric for me to determine if a food is highly processed other than "these people decided it, so it is so". Which is what you're doing here. Guar gum is bad because these people said it's bad. Ok, but, like, why? How did they decide that specifically? On the index, why is garlic powder a 37 while chili powder which contains rice concentrate (what is that?!) is a 1? Is garlic powder, which only lists garlic as an ingredient, 37x worse for me than chili powder? What I information am I actually gaining from this index? How is looking at this index informing me of making a healthy choice at all? https://www.truefood.tech/product/wf_365-by-whole-foods-market-garlic-powder-201-oz-b074v3vp5k?store=all https://www.truefood.tech/product/wf_365-by-whole-foods-mark... https://www.truefood.tech/product/wf_simply-organic-organic-chili-powder-289-oz-b00269xe0q?store=all https://www.truefood.tech/product/wf_simply-organic-organic-...

walterbell 3y ago
Perhaps this is not the right index for you? Please do share indexes and professional sources that you find genuinely useful.
- harry8 3y ago
  If an index is being touted and it's garbage it is harmful. (I have not formed an opinion on the index being assessed). The point being if it's extremely variable it /will/ be gamed and will work against you. The circular arrow symbol on plastics is a recent example where poor definition of what it meant has even led to consumers believing a symbol indicating non-recyclable means recyclable. A superior indicator for consumers that would get vastly less wrong is "plastic is not recyclable." This or any index to provide information to consumers should be aggressively scrutinized. What it is today will not be what it becomes unless it can be defended, which requires thorough and widespread understanding.
  - walterbell 3y ago
    > I have not formed an opinion on the index being assessed If you do later form an opinion on this particular index, it may be more consequential to file a github issue against the index, rather than appending to a dormant HN thread.

walterbell 3y ago

Perhaps this is not the right index for you? Please do share indexes and professional sources that you find genuinely useful.

harry8 3y ago
If an index is being touted and it's garbage it is harmful. (I have not formed an opinion on the index being assessed). The point being if it's extremely variable it /will/ be gamed and will work against you. The circular arrow symbol on plastics is a recent example where poor definition of what it meant has even led to consumers believing a symbol indicating non-recyclable means recyclable. A superior indicator for consumers that would get vastly less wrong is "plastic is not recyclable." This or any index to provide information to consumers should be aggressively scrutinized. What it is today will not be what it becomes unless it can be defended, which requires thorough and widespread understanding.
- walterbell 3y ago
  > I have not formed an opinion on the index being assessed If you do later form an opinion on this particular index, it may be more consequential to file a github issue against the index, rather than appending to a dormant HN thread.