5 ms·

To be fair, this evolved naturally. The TI calculators were progamable, my brother used those. Then the pocket pcs (windows ce) had 3rd party programs, those

To be fair, this evolved naturally. The TI calculators were progamable, my brother used those. Then the pocket pcs (windows ce) had 3rd party programs, those were distributed as files by the publisher. Program stores were webpages were people sold their files. I used the skyscape medical books; you installed the program as usual, then you bought a code specific for your version and file. All that done through a webpage Then we have android. Google had the Marketplace (now playstore) as we know it today, except packages didnt use google services to validate licenses, Many times it was just a package (a file) The main progress was ease of use. Then comes iOS and their extreme BS of not being able to "sideload" "apps" The store is no longer a convenience, it is a requirement. For your safety, of course. The main "progress" here is that they convinced many "Americans" that a commodity affordable phone with a painted cartoon of a bitten apple is "Exclusive", as VIP only. I compare it to the NFT phenomena, except the fruit cartoon did stick.

redundantly 3y ago
> For your safety, of course. I know they have ulterior motives for their walled garden, but this is a product of said garden. The App Store is by far much safer to use than Google's Play Store. Plus the parental controls on android are essentially non-existent. I'm happy in this walled garden.
- AnthonyMouse 3y ago
  The premise of a walled garden is to keep unwanted things out, not to imprison you inside. Apple maintaining a store where they've vetted everything in it is fine, and if you like you can refuse to install anything from outside of it. That doesn't justify them prohibiting you from installing anything from outside of it. It should be up to you. If you wanted to, you could even configure your phone to not add any new stores without a factory wipe. But maybe first you want to add in the repositories that have only free and open source software, or the stores of some respected game publishers who offer lower prices if you use their own stores for their games. And maybe the existence of these stores would encourage Apple to charge lower fees, and then you benefit from the lower fees even if you choose never to install anything from those stores, since your option to exerts competitive pressure on the stores(s) you are willing to use.
  - redundantly 3y ago
    I'm not arguing that it shouldn't be opened up. I'm just stating that by being a walled garden it is safer. When things eventually open up, when Apple is finally forced to permit other app stores on their mobile devices, I'll take a hard pass on them.
    - catlikesshrimp 3y ago
      Consider these two statements: 1) I happy having a walled garden, I feel safe 2) I am happy being imprisoned in a walled garden with no door, I feel safe
      - redundantly 3y ago
        Consider these two scenarios: 1. I choose to buy Apple products because I enjoy the security and features of them, and can leave the ecosystem anytime I choose to. 2. I'm indentured to Apple, Tim Cook owns my soul and the souls of my children, and we can never escape.
    - Nevermark 3y ago
      "Walled garden" does not mean "safe system". And it is not a prerequisite for a safe system, or vice versa. You are saying you are happy in a "safe secure system". In contrast, a "walled garden" is a prohibition on alternatives, not a source of safety. The prohibition of alternatives does not make the App Store safer. If anything, it protects Apple from competing with safter alternatives! Like an app store only for children. Or an app store of formally verified apps. Please correct me if I am somehow missing something...
    - themaninthedark 3y ago
      But it is not safer: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 There are still scam apps on Apple and apparently they don't get removed promptly either. This one was reported 12 days before the post was made. Many of the comments in the thread are telling the poster that he "should have verified the app" >It's possible that it's just because it was literally called "Bitcoin Wallet", >an exact match for your search, or boosted by fake reviews, or it was actually >an ad that you didn't notice. Though it shouldn't have gotten past review at >all >But I don't really understand why you'd blindly trust some random app? So not safer, just more restrictive.
- beeboobaa 3y ago
  [flagged]
- celticninja 3y ago
  Have you tried parental controls on Android or are you just taking out of the side of your mouth? I have parental controls for my kids android devices and it works exceptionally well. I am not dissing the apple version because I have not used it, and based on your comment I have to assume you have not used the android parent controls and are just needing to convince yourself that apple are better and the apple premium you are paying is worth it. Spoiler: it isn't.
  - redundantly 3y ago
    I have tried it. More than one phone from different carriers. The parental controls are lacking. It's been a couple of years since I've last tried, but given Google's history regarding subpar controls I doubt it has gotten appreciably better.
    - celticninja 3y ago
      What were the subpar controls? I use it daily for my kids so would genuinely like to know what you feel didn't/doesn't work because for the last 4 or 5 years I have never had one issue using it.
    - makeitdouble 3y ago
      > More than one phone from different carriers. I'm confused by this. Did it come to play regarding parental controls ? Like an extra layer from the carrier ?
      - celticninja 3y ago
        Yeah seems to detract from the Google angle if it's carrier related
- celticninja 3y ago
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 So safe in this walled garden where Apple reviews all apps for user safety and security.
  - redundantly 3y ago
    I didn't claim that it's perfect, just that it's safer. Regarding smartphone safety, the only truly safe thing to do is not not use one at all.
    - celticninja 3y ago
      Everybody who lives dies, so to avoid dying just dont ever live. Solid workable solution you have proposed there.
- megous 3y ago
  Based on something "real" like scam/fraud metrics, or just "this is what Tim Cook wants me to think"? Both stores are walled gardens. One onboarding experience: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 :-D

redundantly 3y ago

> For your safety, of course. I know they have ulterior motives for their walled garden, but this is a product of said garden. The App Store is by far much safer to use than Google's Play Store. Plus the parental controls on android are essentially non-existent. I'm happy in this walled garden.

AnthonyMouse 3y ago
The premise of a walled garden is to keep unwanted things out, not to imprison you inside. Apple maintaining a store where they've vetted everything in it is fine, and if you like you can refuse to install anything from outside of it. That doesn't justify them prohibiting you from installing anything from outside of it. It should be up to you. If you wanted to, you could even configure your phone to not add any new stores without a factory wipe. But maybe first you want to add in the repositories that have only free and open source software, or the stores of some respected game publishers who offer lower prices if you use their own stores for their games. And maybe the existence of these stores would encourage Apple to charge lower fees, and then you benefit from the lower fees even if you choose never to install anything from those stores, since your option to exerts competitive pressure on the stores(s) you are willing to use.
- redundantly 3y ago
  I'm not arguing that it shouldn't be opened up. I'm just stating that by being a walled garden it is safer. When things eventually open up, when Apple is finally forced to permit other app stores on their mobile devices, I'll take a hard pass on them.
  - catlikesshrimp 3y ago
    Consider these two statements: 1) I happy having a walled garden, I feel safe 2) I am happy being imprisoned in a walled garden with no door, I feel safe
    - redundantly 3y ago
      Consider these two scenarios: 1. I choose to buy Apple products because I enjoy the security and features of them, and can leave the ecosystem anytime I choose to. 2. I'm indentured to Apple, Tim Cook owns my soul and the souls of my children, and we can never escape.
  - Nevermark 3y ago
    "Walled garden" does not mean "safe system". And it is not a prerequisite for a safe system, or vice versa. You are saying you are happy in a "safe secure system". In contrast, a "walled garden" is a prohibition on alternatives, not a source of safety. The prohibition of alternatives does not make the App Store safer. If anything, it protects Apple from competing with safter alternatives! Like an app store only for children. Or an app store of formally verified apps. Please correct me if I am somehow missing something...
  - themaninthedark 3y ago
    But it is not safer: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 There are still scam apps on Apple and apparently they don't get removed promptly either. This one was reported 12 days before the post was made. Many of the comments in the thread are telling the poster that he "should have verified the app" >It's possible that it's just because it was literally called "Bitcoin Wallet", >an exact match for your search, or boosted by fake reviews, or it was actually >an ad that you didn't notice. Though it shouldn't have gotten past review at >all >But I don't really understand why you'd blindly trust some random app? So not safer, just more restrictive.
beeboobaa 3y ago
[flagged]
celticninja 3y ago
Have you tried parental controls on Android or are you just taking out of the side of your mouth? I have parental controls for my kids android devices and it works exceptionally well. I am not dissing the apple version because I have not used it, and based on your comment I have to assume you have not used the android parent controls and are just needing to convince yourself that apple are better and the apple premium you are paying is worth it. Spoiler: it isn't.
- redundantly 3y ago
  I have tried it. More than one phone from different carriers. The parental controls are lacking. It's been a couple of years since I've last tried, but given Google's history regarding subpar controls I doubt it has gotten appreciably better.
  - celticninja 3y ago
    What were the subpar controls? I use it daily for my kids so would genuinely like to know what you feel didn't/doesn't work because for the last 4 or 5 years I have never had one issue using it.
  - makeitdouble 3y ago
    > More than one phone from different carriers. I'm confused by this. Did it come to play regarding parental controls ? Like an extra layer from the carrier ?
    - celticninja 3y ago
      Yeah seems to detract from the Google angle if it's carrier related
celticninja 3y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 So safe in this walled garden where Apple reviews all apps for user safety and security.
- redundantly 3y ago
  I didn't claim that it's perfect, just that it's safer. Regarding smartphone safety, the only truly safe thing to do is not not use one at all.
  - celticninja 3y ago
    Everybody who lives dies, so to avoid dying just dont ever live. Solid workable solution you have proposed there.
megous 3y ago
Based on something "real" like scam/fraud metrics, or just "this is what Tim Cook wants me to think"? Both stores are walled gardens. One onboarding experience: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272 :-D