3 ms·
You didn't give a time frame. So I would say, there are no skills that cannot be replaced by AI in an indefinite time frame. AI might have mastered just about
by ilaksh 3y ago
You didn't give a time frame. So I would say, there are no skills that cannot be replaced by AI in an indefinite time frame.
AI might have mastered just about every skill or capability within 10 or 20 years. Some people suspect less.
Your list isn't really just skills but more generally abilities.
Emotional IQ - See the Inflection 2.5 model (Pi).
Creativity - Ask ChatGPT to help you be creative writing poetry and then creating paintings of the poems.
Leadership/management - Claude 3 or GPT4 might be better than the average manager. 70% of my bosses have been barely competent pr!cks though, so I may be biased.
Negotiation is not that complex actually. It's boils down to being willing to walk away. Leading LLMs can be good negotiators already.
Hand-eye coordination - not for every single task, but we have robots that can play ping pong, juggle, catch balls, and solve a Rubik's cube faster than humanely possible.
Critical thinking skills: put the average person off the street against Claude 3 Opus or GPT-4 Turbo and have them take a GRE or similar test. I would bet on the AI.
For your list, we are already there.
I think that "replaced" is not necessarily the best way to think about it though. People still play chess. Or run. Or Jeopardy. We still have plenty of amateur artists that just want to imitate their favorite cartoon or whatever. Even though AI can do all of that better and faster now.
But wait 10 or 20 years. There will be very realistic and fully capable simulations of humans.
- barbazoo 3y ago> But wait 10 or 20 years. There will be very realistic and fully capable simulations of humans. So sometime between FSD and fusion as an energy source.
- sgtpepper1235 3y agoPerfect
- schwartzworld 3y agoThis is comment is the problem with AI. You listed a bunch of things as proof that AI can replace human skills but many are wrong or at least require moving the goal post. Poetry and lyrics from AI are usually lame and formulaic. A robot solving a Rubik's cube is less impressive than a human doing so, since Rubik's cube is basically about memorizing the algorithm. Chatgpt might be better than your manager, but managers don't lead. Every manager I've reported to has basically had the job of primarily relaying communication from above.