3 ms·
A lot of people will say the solution is to design a better chat bot. I think a better solution would be to stop using AI and even better, take down the entire
by vouaobrasil 3y ago
A lot of people will say the solution is to design a better chat bot. I think a better solution would be to stop using AI and even better, take down the entire system of large corporations.
Because if you think about it, large corporations are the machine that transform human beings into resources: the large corporation by its very nature must disregard human decency in order to function. You can see this even excluding the effects and use of AI: they are the physical embodiment of capitalism without anything else due to their size.
We might think about solving the immediate problem of Chatbots, but they only exist because of big tech and thus it is the environment that is the problem, not just the result.
- scld 3y agoIs there an employee number range for a corporation when it transitions from "humans working together" to "machine that transforms human beings into resources" ?
- lexicality 3y agoI think it's the point where it stops being a cooperative venture and turns into a managed one. That point is different for every company, but if you've worked at a startup that grew enough, you have definitely experienced the changeover.
- vouaobrasil 3y agoIt's more like a percentage increase: the number of employees (P) is proportional to the machine-like state (M) of the corporation as a rough approximation. M = aP Where a is a constant that depends on the overall state of society, how capitalistic it is, how much regulation exists, etc. And then we could say M itself is proportional to the probability that various inhuman actions will be undertaken (where of course the probability is suitably transformed to make sense being proportional to an unbounded variable).