5 ms·
I was thinking yesterday how 70% ethanol is like the perfect disinfectant and we don’t use it. It’s what we used when working in sterile conditions when I was
by Mistletoe 3y ago
I was thinking yesterday how 70% ethanol is like the perfect disinfectant and we don’t use it. It’s what we used when working in sterile conditions when I was a scientist. You certainly wouldn’t use quat disinfectants to spray your gloves before working in a hood. You’d know it would probably get in your experiment and mess it up. Ethanol is perfect, it evaporates and leaves nothing. I assume we don’t use ethanol because people would drink it, or it costs too much. Both aren’t great reasons when safety is what you are throwing out.
- throwup238 3y agoIt evaporates too fast to fully penetrate all surfaces and isn't as effective against a bunch of biological vectors like spores that require prolonged contact to really kill. Quat disinfectants leave a residue behind that continues killing stuff and they're generally less irritating to skin and the respiratory system (though that's for people using the room after it was disinfected, not necessarily for the person doing the disinfecting).
- arijun 3y agoWhat about suspending the ethanol like in alcohol gel? Could we find a gelling agent that is less irritating than the quat disinfectant residue?
- throwup238 3y agoThat works fine for hand sanitizer but it becomes too viscous to spray as disinfectant, which is important for hospitals.
- SkyPuncher 3y agoIt's also very flammable, which is a bit of a problem.
- briHass 3y agoWell, we do use it in most hand-sanitizer solutions. I assume alcohol isn't a popular (home) cleaner because it is volatile and requires high concentrations (70%+) to be effective. From a cost perspective, the Clorox Company no doubt prefers to add a few grams of a quat to multiple gallons of scented water, which means they're basically selling a spray bottle of a nearly-free solution that is 99.5% water for $5. Shipping 70% alcohol also brings with it a Flammability-3 (high) hazard label.
- copperx 3y agoIt should be illegal to sell such unconcentrated solutions, except perhaps in food (e.g., even milk is easily reconstituted). It would be much more efficient to sell the concentrated chemical and let consumers dilute them. Imagine the fuel savings, shelf space savings of not having to ship 99.9% water around the world. I remember some medicines were dispensed like that in the 80s, and the patient had to reconstitute them before using.
- briHass 3y agoYou can usually get concentrated cleaning solutions, but they tend to be used more by industry/businesses. These quats are sold concentrated as dish sanitizer (mixed in a sink full of water) for restaurants, for example. I think consumers would just rather have ready-to-use spray bottles in most cases. There's probably a surprising number of people that couldn't do the basic math of diluting based on a formula.
- Spooky23 3y agoOne of the issues that I discovered during COVID is that alcohol isn’t a scheduled pesticide because it predates the regulation. So applications that are regulated cannot use alcohol unless they can use a listed product, which is rare and expensive
- r3trohack3r 3y agoPersonally I’m a fan of putting a mixture of salt, water, and vinegar through hydrolysis to get sodium hydroxide and hydrogen chloride. Super cheap and effective cleaner, easy to make at home. Only downside is it isn’t shelf stable, so you have to make a new batch every ~2 weeks. Force of nature has a pretty neat kit that automates the chemistry.
- amluto 3y agoYou do what? I’m afraid you have the reaction products wrong. This is the chloralkali process, and you get hydroxide, hydrogen, and chlorine gas. The latter is extremely nasty. If you do it right (which I can almost guarantee you are not doing), it will react with water to form hypochlorite (that’s your fairly safe disinfectant) and chloride (harmless). But this reaction goes the other way in acidic conditions: hypochlorite will turn into chlorine gas. DO NOT run the chloralkali process indoors. DO NOT run it near your face. DO NOT think you’re clever and run it in a closed container — not only is the chlorine toxic, but it can explode when mixed with hydrogen. DO NOT mix bleach-containing products with acids. Just buy plain bleach (the “sanitizing” kind), dilute it carefully with water, and use it in an appropriate concentration. (You can safely do the chloralkali process in a cell with a high flow of salty swimming pool water, with safety measures to turn it off if the flow stops.)
- Filligree 3y agoSpeaking of sanitising bleach, does it have a best-before date? I have a bottle of it sitting around, but it’s quite old and I’m not sure if the date on it is when it was made or when it should be discarded.
- amluto 3y agoProbably discard it. Hypochlorite is unstable, and it loses potency. Or, if you’re feeling adventurous, dilute it 1:20000 or so and measure it with a pool test kit. Also, one of the degradation products is chlorite, which is somewhat nasty. You can find actual research from the swimming pool chemical industry. At higher concentrations (bleach sold for swimming pools is more concentrated), it’s less stable and apparently should ideally be used within 30 days in hot weather. The household stuff ought (good luck!) to be more stable, and you’re probably not storing it in a hot pool equipment room.
- TheJoeMan 3y agoMy company’s product includes a piece of acrylic (PMMA). Ethanol would jellify it, quats are basically our only approved disinfectant.
- dist-epoch 3y agoLots of stuff is resistent to 70% ethanol - norovirus for example.