5 ms·
Note that this future, as well as requiring insane amounts of super cheap electricity, also requires someone to figure out cheap direct air capture of CO2. No
by londons_explore 3y ago
Note that this future, as well as requiring insane amounts of super cheap electricity, also requires someone to figure out cheap direct air capture of CO2. Nobody is even remotely close to that yet.
- icegreentea2 3y agoFor what it's worth, I think they (as in Terraform) intend to also tackle that part of the problem. I think one advantage they have over current DAC approaches is that since they're going straight from their capture material into their methane reactor, they are both creating a valuable output from their carbon capture (where as most current systems need to add sequestration costs).
- marcosdumay 3y agoThere's a lot we can do with hydrogen alone. But yep, carbon capture from the air is very important.
- reducesuffering 3y agoThat is literally what Casey Handmer, author of the post, has a company working on, because he’s accurately projecting the exponential solar energy increases coming.
- kkoste 3y ago> Cheap direct air capture of CO2. What is wrong with trees or algaes? Seems to me it doesn't get much cheaper than that.