4 ms·
Exactly. MSFT is who won here. I highly recommend you all watch OpenAI section of the new ALL-IN Podcast. Sam and OpenAI is in a very bad situation if Elon gets
by aedon 3y ago
Exactly. MSFT is who won here. I highly recommend you all watch OpenAI section of the new ALL-IN Podcast. Sam and OpenAI is in a very bad situation if Elon gets heard by a fair judge.
- cowsandmilk 3y agoWhat, the podcast that is all of Elon’s best friends thinks he has a case? What a surprise!
- Timber-6539 3y agoI don't see the problem here. Are you not able to discern different arguments/ideas and come to conclusions by yourself?
- marshray 3y agoI watched some on a recommendation and used to see some of their ideas on X-Twitter. One conclusion I came to was that I didn't respect those people's ability to discern or conclude.
- Timber-6539 3y agoWho cares whether you respect their ability to discern or conclude? Did you get the argument or not, and did it make sense to you in the situation? That's all that matters.
- ben_w 3y agoOnly a lawyer can really do that in legal cases. You know how Hollywood gets computers, coding, and hacking wrong? That's how bad non-lawyers are with law. Or, pertinently to this case — who knows more law: one of us, or ChatGPT?
- hef19898 3y agoOne of us IANAL folks have one thing ChatGPT doesn't: we don't make up stuff up.
- ben_w 3y agoOne of the more amusing dismissals of ChatGPT that I've heard is "mansplaining as a service". We absolutely do make stuff up, we just don't realise we're doing it.
- hef19898 3y agoTrue, absolutely true. At least I hope most lawyers don't make up stuff in court filings, unless they use ChatGPT...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- matwood 3y agoA 'fair judge'? You mean one that applies the law? Most of the experts I've seen say the case has no chance. Or are you saying this is another 4d chess move like what happened with Twitter?