Sure, but even if it's a typo for verbatim, I still don't quite understand what "a markdown verbatim" would mean where verbatim is the noun. I've always though

Sure, but even if it's a typo for verbatim, I still don't quite understand what "a markdown verbatim" would mean where verbatim is the noun. I've always thought of the daringfireball.net[1] page as the authoritative source of Markdown syntax, and it calls them "code blocks." It looks like Pandoc[2] talks about "verbatim environments" in the same way. And clang[3] has a method for extracting documentation formatted as "markdown verbatim," instead of applying formatting to the document. [1] https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#precode https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#precode [2] https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#verbatim https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#verbatim [3] https://clang.llvm.org/extra/doxygen/classclang_1_1clangd_1_1markup_1_1Document.html#a37daf3c7575b93a2f83e9486b3111290 https://clang.llvm.org/extra/doxygen/classclang_1_1clangd_1_... I went to Gemini to ask it what a "markdown verbatism" was and: > In markdown, verbatims are code snippets or text that you want displayed exactly as you typed it, without markdown interpreting any formatting instructions. it seems to be applying the Pandoc usage, which I found a few other places too. But it strikes me as an excessively jargon-heavy way of talking about code blocks or pre-formatted blocks when those terms seem resolve the nuance and would be common in other contexts. The idea that it's a clever way to escape a blacklist is interesting too.