3 ms·
Well, the UAW doesn't want to accept parity with foreign auto-maker wages. The article states a $3-4 disparity, but it's really more than that due to the great
by mdasen 18y ago
Well, the UAW doesn't want to accept parity with foreign auto-maker wages. The article states a $3-4 disparity, but it's really more than that due to the great benefits accorded to UAW workers.
While I generally like unions, in this case no matter how much bailout money the US auto-makers get, they're headed for bankruptcy unless they can bring their labor costs in line with those of foreign firms. UAW, if you're listening, you have two options: get off your rump and drive the wages up at Honda and Toyota (unionizing their plants) or resign yourselves to never having any say in anything ever again.
- bkbleikamp 18y agoAmerican auto companies cars cost, on average, $2,000 more to make than those of foreign competitors. Until that difference is gone, they will never be competitive. They lose $2,000 of quality or features and are expected to be competitive? Yeah, right. In any other industry this would force a company out of business, but for some reason we think the automakers deserve our help? If an iPod was $50 more per unit to produce than a Zune they would never be able to compete and the iPod would fail because they are losing $50 worth of quality per unit - whether that quality is gone from the software, hardware, or both, it would be impossible to compete.
- danteembermage 18y agoAhh, but with a 25% tariff on your side that $2000 is well within the bounds of your cushion on a truck or SUV. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3155 http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3155
- programnature 18y agohealth care costs per vehicle are between 1000-1700. We collectively, and the auto industry in particular, are at a big disadvantage until these costs are brought under control http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070227/AUTO01/702270372/1148 http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070227/A...
- patio11 18y agoWhile I know Toyota is staffed mostly by robotic ninjas, presumably they need health care once and a while, too. Japan enjoys a standard of healthcare right up there with the US. Toyota also manages to pay American worker's healthcare expenses and still profit handsomely. Find another scapegoat?
- jimbokun 18y ago"Toyota also manages to pay American worker's healthcare expenses and still profit handsomely." I think it's pretty well established that Toyota pays less for health care for their U.S. employees than the Big 3, and a large part of the reason for this is that the Big 3 are paying for health care for a lot of retirees who are no longer making cars. The NY Times had an analysis showing that most of the difference in "labor costs" between Big 3 and foreign makers was due to higher retiree benefits.
- tocomment 18y agoBad analogy, the Zune is harmful at any price/quality.
- me2i81 18y agoThe benefits you're talking about are those that were promised as pension and healthcare obligations to already-retired workers. The difference between UAW and non-UAW wages and benefits for current workers isn't that large.
- KWD 18y agoExactly. If you remove the pensions that are lumped in with all the reported hourly rates, it is not that big of a difference, and what is there is in the healthcare benefits not hourly pay rate. I think the Republicans were just happy that their spin factory came up with a way they could pin an excuse on someone else for not passing the bill. I wasn't really in favor of the bailout plan (mostly after the idea of a car czar was introduced), but I think these guys need to be honest in why they were against it.