4 ms·
You're the one bogged down in mechanical details, trying to nitpick the definition of "malfunction". I'm only trying to argue that a DDoS isn't meaningfully spe
by andrewflnr 3y ago
You're the one bogged down in mechanical details, trying to nitpick the definition of "malfunction". I'm only trying to argue that a DDoS isn't meaningfully speech. None of your what-ifs actually change that. Speech has the intent of communicating with humans. DDoSs do not (if they have content, it's incidental to their primary goal).
- Dylan16807 3y agoI'm arguing that it's largely the same as a counter-protest. A counter-protest is primarily trying to overwhelm someone else's speech, not to tell people anything. But it still gets classified as speech. Is there a crucial difference I'm missing here?
- andrewflnr 3y agoOh, so it's counter-protests you don't understand.