4 ms·

> It's not clear whether the regulator will have power only over online platforms hosted in Canada or over all websites accessible by Canadians. Canada is irre

> It's not clear whether the regulator will have power only over online platforms hosted in Canada or over all websites accessible by Canadians. Canada is irrelevant, it cannot enforce anything beyond its borders. This regulation will be used as a pretext later to create a digital identity and violate users’ privacy even more. The children’s safety argument is the responsibility of their parents/guardians, not the government. If the government really cares about children, it should start by tackling the drug problem.

unsupp0rted 3y ago
Or the homelessness problem. Or the food bank queues problem. These are much more serious and more pressing threats to child welfare in Canada than PornHub is. Unfortunately, solutions to these problems don’t require implementing digital ID for Canadians, so these are non-starters.
- bryanlarsen 3y ago
  You know governments work on multiple things simultaneously? They announce new measures to combat the housing problems about once a week. This week it was giving BC $2B to build new homes. Unfortunately it takes years for measures like that to move the needle.
  - brailsafe 3y ago
    > You know governments work on multiple things simultaneously? If only someone told them that 8 years ago, maybe they could have moved the needle by now ;) woops
    - bryanlarsen 3y ago
      For the last 40 or so years Canadian governments have been trying to have their cake and eat it too. Home prices going up was a good thing, because home owners were far more reliable voters then renters. So we saw lots of programs like the RRSP first time home buyer program, which made it easier for new buyers to buy and by increasing demand, made prices go up. Remember that people thought the 2008 crash in the States was caused by too many houses. Voters and governments concentrate on preventing the last crisis from happening again. The next crisis is a lot harder to focus on until it actually happens.
      - brailsafe 3y ago
        > home owners were far more reliable voters then renters As far as I can tell, while this may be the assumption that politicians have been using, it doesn't seem necessarily accurate beyond a correlation with age and wealth. It may or may not be, but I'm not aware of public data that reliably makes such a direct association in Canada, and I wonder if the numbers would look similar to likelihood of having developed heart disease. But I agree with the rest of the sentiment
rokkitmensch 3y ago
THANK OF THE CHILLLLDORNS

unsupp0rted 3y ago

Or the homelessness problem. Or the food bank queues problem. These are much more serious and more pressing threats to child welfare in Canada than PornHub is. Unfortunately, solutions to these problems don’t require implementing digital ID for Canadians, so these are non-starters.

bryanlarsen 3y ago
You know governments work on multiple things simultaneously? They announce new measures to combat the housing problems about once a week. This week it was giving BC $2B to build new homes. Unfortunately it takes years for measures like that to move the needle.
- brailsafe 3y ago
  > You know governments work on multiple things simultaneously? If only someone told them that 8 years ago, maybe they could have moved the needle by now ;) woops
  - bryanlarsen 3y ago
    For the last 40 or so years Canadian governments have been trying to have their cake and eat it too. Home prices going up was a good thing, because home owners were far more reliable voters then renters. So we saw lots of programs like the RRSP first time home buyer program, which made it easier for new buyers to buy and by increasing demand, made prices go up. Remember that people thought the 2008 crash in the States was caused by too many houses. Voters and governments concentrate on preventing the last crisis from happening again. The next crisis is a lot harder to focus on until it actually happens.
    - brailsafe 3y ago
      > home owners were far more reliable voters then renters As far as I can tell, while this may be the assumption that politicians have been using, it doesn't seem necessarily accurate beyond a correlation with age and wealth. It may or may not be, but I'm not aware of public data that reliably makes such a direct association in Canada, and I wonder if the numbers would look similar to likelihood of having developed heart disease. But I agree with the rest of the sentiment

rokkitmensch 3y ago

THANK OF THE CHILLLLDORNS