4 ms·

Yeah, maybe not all of the article but it still is. Pro life ass propaganda without scientific merit.

• bamboozled 3y ago
  Population is separate to climate change.
  • sitkack 3y ago
    Given your submission history of climate articles, you are going to argue that neither has a direct affect on the other?
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
  • Zetobal 3y ago
    They are still talking about it in both articles on the frontpage including this shitty one. wtf is wrong with you all telling me to read the article without reading it yourself?
    • bamboozled 3y ago
      They mention climate change, the article isn't about climate change. There is nothing in there about population control. I think you read the first paragraph, got outraged and commented angrily.
      • Zetobal 3y ago
        No, it's just that they are more correlated than your now-deleted "if we just go nuclear it's all going to be fine" fever dream comment.
        • bamboozled 3y ago
          I repeat, the article isn't about climate change.