3 ms·
Ehm no, reflogs are notoriously local... To be 100% sure that something hasn't changed recently I tried and, nope, your revision command only looks at the loca
by g-b-r 3y ago
Ehm no, reflogs are notoriously local...
To be 100% sure that something hasn't changed recently I tried and, nope, your revision command only looks at the local reflog, after a forced push you get different answers from the original repository (that has the full reflog) and a new clone.
- ylyn 3y agoI'm very confused by your comment. The grandparent comment talks about using the gitrevisions syntax in a GitHub URL to search the reflog stored on GitHub. Nothing to do with your local clone of a repository.
- semiquaver 3y agoYes, I refer to the reflog on GitHub’s git file servers which tracks the historical state of refs there.
- g-b-r 3y agoI'm sorry, I was on mobile and for some strange reason didn't check the whole link. I guess I was tired. Incredible, I didn't know about it.