4 ms·

But just like privacy issues, this'll be possible. It's only bad because society still hasn't normalised sex, from a gay perspective y'all are prude af. It's

But just like privacy issues, this'll be possible. It's only bad because society still hasn't normalised sex, from a gay perspective y'all are prude af. It's a shortcut, for us to just accept that these social ideals and expectations will have to change so we may as well do it now. In 100 years, people will be able to make a personal AI that looks, sounds and behaves like any person they want and does anything they want. We'll have thinking dust, you can already buy cameras like a mm^2, in the future I imagine they'll be even smaller. At some point it's going to get increasingly unproductive trying to safeguard technology without people's social expectations changing. Same thing with Google Glass, shunned pretttty much exclusively bc it has a camera on it (even tho phones at the time did too), but now we got Ray Bans camera glasses and 50 years from now all glasses will have cameras, if we even still wear them.

spazx 3y ago
Yes this. This is what I've been trying to explain to my friends. When Tron came out in 1982, it was disliked because back then using CGI effects was considered "cheating". Then awhile later Pixar did movies entirely with CGI and they were hits. Now almost every big studio movie uses CGI. Shunned to embraced in like, 13 years. I think over time the general consensus's views about AI models will soften. Although it might take longer in some communities. (Username checks out lol, furry here also. I think the furs may take longer to embrace it.) (Also, people will still continue to use older tools like Photoshop to accomplish similar things.)
- fennecbutt 3y ago
  Yes many furs I know are very anti AI art etc, including overreacting to how "bad" it looks, though if I hadn't told em it was AI generated I don't think they'd have the same reaction. Ironic, since so many furs are in tech, but we all have artist friends I suppose. People just forget that portrait painters were put out of business by photographers, and traditional artists were put out of business by digital artists. And so the cycle and the luddism repeats.

spazx 3y ago

Yes this. This is what I've been trying to explain to my friends. When Tron came out in 1982, it was disliked because back then using CGI effects was considered "cheating". Then awhile later Pixar did movies entirely with CGI and they were hits. Now almost every big studio movie uses CGI. Shunned to embraced in like, 13 years. I think over time the general consensus's views about AI models will soften. Although it might take longer in some communities. (Username checks out lol, furry here also. I think the furs may take longer to embrace it.) (Also, people will still continue to use older tools like Photoshop to accomplish similar things.)

fennecbutt 3y ago
Yes many furs I know are very anti AI art etc, including overreacting to how "bad" it looks, though if I hadn't told em it was AI generated I don't think they'd have the same reaction. Ironic, since so many furs are in tech, but we all have artist friends I suppose. People just forget that portrait painters were put out of business by photographers, and traditional artists were put out of business by digital artists. And so the cycle and the luddism repeats.