3 ms·
I really don't get why there is this obsession with safe "Responsible Generative AI". I mean it writes some bad words, or bad pics, a human can do that without
by wouldbecouldbe 3y ago
I really don't get why there is this obsession with safe "Responsible Generative AI".
I mean it writes some bad words, or bad pics, a human can do that without help as well.
The good thing about dangerous knowledge and generative AI is that you're never sure haha, you'd be a fool to ask GPT to make a bomb. I mean it would probably be safe, since it will make up half of the steps.
- refulgentis 3y agoI guess what I'd tell you is, there's a lot of fools in this world.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- myaccountonhn 3y agoBecause otherwise stuff like this happens, and you get (rightfully) upset customers: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/12/google-racism-ban-gorilla-black-people https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/12/google-ra... https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-58462511 https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-58462511 Also people are using LLMs to learn (horrifying but reality), it would be unresponsible for them to let it to propagate negative stereotypes and biases.
- wouldbecouldbe 3y agoBut that's exactly because it's trying to be righteous.
- pradn 3y agoBias is a real problem, but more than that - an adversarial press and public won't forgive massive brands like Google for making AIs that spit out racist answers.