4 ms·
Sounds like it's "reasonable" for you not to update then.
by legohead 3y ago
Sounds like it's "reasonable" for you not to update then.
- wahnfrieden 3y agoIt says you must make efforts (to a reasonable extent), not that you must give a reason for not making efforts
- reissbaker 3y agoThis is a TOS, meaning their enforcement option is a lawsuit. In court, if you convincingly argue why it would take an unreasonable amount of effort to update, you win. They can't compel you to unreasonable effort as per their own TOS.
- generalizations 3y agoThis assumes they even know that the model hasn't been updated. Who is this actually intended for? I'd bet it's for companies hosting the model. In those cases, the definition of reasonable effort is a little closer to "it'll break our stuff if we touch it" rather than "oh silly me, I forgot how to spell r-s-y-n-c".
- reissbaker 3y agoHosting companies can probably just claim they're covered under Section 230, and Google has to go bother the individual users, not them.
- staticman2 3y agoI don't believe that would apply if the host is curating the models they host.
- alwayslikethis 3y agoOh I tried to update, it's just that my router drops the connection after a few hundred MBs...
- wongarsu 3y agoIf you evaluate what it takes to update, and judge the effort unreasonable, that should be enough. Maybe make a powerpoint presenting that result, if you want something for the lawyers. If you don't see a way forward that leads to a result with reasonable effort you don't have to continue working on it until you hit some arbitrary threshold for unreasonable effort.