3 ms·
Ignoring the fact that while doing that, there also happens to be a near 4090-level GPU and NPU and integrated memory on the M series chips on a die of approxim
by caycep 3y ago
Ignoring the fact that while doing that, there also happens to be a near 4090-level GPU and NPU and integrated memory on the M series chips on a die of approximately the same size...
- adgjlsfhk1 3y ago[flagged]
- xcv123 3y agoRTX 4090 has more than double the performance of the M2 Ultra https://wccftech.com/apple-m2-ultra-soc-isnt-faster-than-amd-intel-last-year-desktop-cpus-50-slower-than-nvidia-rtx-4080/ https://wccftech.com/apple-m2-ultra-soc-isnt-faster-than-amd...
- techie128 3y agoYou're comparing a 600W system (450W TDP GPU + 150W TDP Intel Core i9-13900KS) with a 90W chip (CPU, GPU & NPU combined). You don't see anything remotely problematic with that comparison?
- caycep 3y agoyeah, basically I think perspective is important to point out, when people are promoting the narrative "AMD has caught up to M1" but ignoring the fact it's not an Apples to Apples comparison. I'm sure 4090 can play cyberpunk with more FPS. And sure, I think the M series CPUs can eke out more single core performance if they devoted all 140 m2 of the die to CPU. But that's not what the M series chips are. Also, there's benchmarks like these: https://owehrens.com/whisper-nvidia-rtx-4090-vs-m1pro-with-mlx/ https://owehrens.com/whisper-nvidia-rtx-4090-vs-m1pro-with-m...
- xcv123 3y agoNo problem with the comparison. I was not comparing power efficiency. We all know that Apple prioritize efficiency. Since power consumption vs performance is non-linear it's possible that the Intel+Nvidia combo would have roughly similar efficiency as M2 at lower wattage, although it certainly won't beat the M2 at 90 watts.