3 ms·
As a user, I certainly do not find it hostile. In a "batteries included" edit a service like copilot that expose all data to a third party is a terrible anti-f
by e12e 3y ago
As a user, I certainly do not find it hostile.
In a "batteries included" edit a service like copilot that expose all data to a third party is a terrible anti-feature.
As for script-oriented plugins vs wasm - I see a tradeoff - and don't think neither are right or wrong.
Cross editor plugins via a common wasm api might be fun, but perhaps not very practical.
Edit: link to relevant issues and discussion:
https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/discussions/3806#discussioncomment-6686976 https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/discussions/3806#discu...
https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/122 https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/122
https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/1927 https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/1927
- ribelo 3y agoCopilot has many fans, and for many, the ability to use Copilot is more important than all the other "batteries-included" features. It's not for me or anyone else to judge. Everyone should make their own choices. Regarding plugins, I'm with Helix from the beginning, i have read everything, and I understand the motivation well and can accept it. Perhaps this is what the ideal editor looks like for creators, but it definitely doesn't look like the ideal editor for me. I respect their decision, but I'm sticking with Neovim and might switch to ZED when Linux support becomes available.
- e12e 3y agoI still don't understand why you claimed that: > [Helix]'s quite hostile towards its own community.
- WuxiFingerHold 3y agoWhy do you consider switching to ZED from Neovim? ZED is lightyears away from a good Neovim setup in terms of functionality and efficiency. The problem with Neovim is the setup and config to do all, but you already mastered it.