3 ms·

Charitable interpretation of previous comment would be “I think it does not seem relevant to problems specified in the article”. Iso 8601 is about date formatt

• sitkack 3y ago
  > I think it does not seem relevant to problems specified in the article Is a low effort way to make someone form a rebuttal in response to no argument. It is pseudo intellectual way to sound smart while offering nothing in return. As if that persons opinion has weight because “they don’t see the relevance”, I know lots of people that “don’t see relevance”. Is our responsibility to educate their feigned confusion?
  • Thorrez 3y ago
    I was saying that TrackerFF's post seemed to me to be unrelated to the article, so I was confused why it was posted. I'm sure other HN readers were confused by the comment as well. I was asking for clarification. TrackerFF or someone else could then clarify the relevance, which I and other HN readers would find useful. My confusion wasn't feigned. I'm actually confused how the comment was relevant to the article. Someone being confused and asking for clarification is a common way that conversations progress and learning happens. It's no one's responsibility to comment on HN. If someone wants to discuss this, that person can reply.
  • falserum 3y ago
    Mist likely it was: It’s a low effort proxy for “this comment is most probably written only after only reading the title”