3 ms·

At the very least, there should be a clear warning not to use the current version of the software. And I think it's reasonable to suggest that the main project

At the very least, there should be a clear warning not to use the current version of the software. And I think it's reasonable to suggest that the main project authors should neither advertise software that's dangerously insecure nor allow it to use the main project's name (which could mislead people into assuming that it's part of the project and similarly well maintained).

Aeolun 3y ago
> which could mislead people into assuming that it's part of the project and similarly well maintained That’s entirely on the idiot that assumes a similarity in name means the project is maintained by the same owner.