4 ms·
My assumption is it’s bad because they lost more money than ever after signing the first one. I’d love to see what the argument _for_ it is. (Edit) sorry not
by kasey_junk 3y ago
My assumption is it’s bad because they lost more money than ever after signing the first one.
I’d love to see what the argument _for_ it is.
(Edit) sorry not losing more money than ever. They had a negative 700m quarter once.