So then I have to ask, if it’s so easy to just sell it off, spending next to nothing and getting more than the tax write off, what if your proposed reason for w

So then I have to ask, if it’s so easy to just sell it off, spending next to nothing and getting more than the tax write off, what if your proposed reason for why they aren’t doing that? Why have they chosen to lose (according to the article in question) $50 million dollars when according to you they can just do nothing at all except give it to someone else and instantly turn that loss into a gain (or at least a lesser loss). And if it’s that easy, why are the studios accountants so blind to this easy solution which is so obvious to you? There is no world in which “because tax write offs” make sense as an answer to this question if your claims of being able to turn around if not a profit than a smaller loss so easily are true.