3 ms·
There’s no implication in her statement that she did it. Her statement is neutral on that. You’re reading more into it than is there.
by metabagel 3y ago
There’s no implication in her statement that she did it. Her statement is neutral on that. You’re reading more into it than is there.
- whimsicalism 3y agothere certainly is... i think it was not intentional
- ToValueFunfetti 3y agoI don't think it's intended to imply she did it; there's a language barrier that is probably confusing things. But "I allegedly did it but they don't know because they didn't see me do it" absolutely implies she did. e: (because she is only denying the existence of evidence and could just as easily deny the claim itself)