3 ms·

Their FM station is a "translator" which listens to their AM station and rebroadcasts it. Translators are a secondary service that must only rebroadcast their p

Their FM station is a "translator" which listens to their AM station and rebroadcasts it. Translators are a secondary service that must only rebroadcast their primary service.

Brybry 3y ago
To add to this with sources: "Loss of primary station's signal. The translator must be set up to go off the air if the main station's signal is lost." [1] and cites regulations [2][3] [1] https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/fm-translators-and-boosters https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/fm-translators-and-boosters [2] https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-74/subpart-L/section-74.1234 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C... [3] https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-74/subpart-L/section-74.1263 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C...
- Angostura 3y ago
  Shame they can't set up 1 1-Watt transmitter on a poll to meet the regulations and then sent a direct feed to to the FM transmitter
  - amelius 3y ago
    Shame they can't just retransmit an internet radio station they receive over satellite.
    - geerlingguy 3y ago
      The main purpose of translators is to give AM radio stations an avenue (at lower cost than an FM only license) to reach listeners on the FM band and have a more consistent signal throughout the day — but they only keep that privilege if they continue maintaining the AM broadcast facilities as the primary signal. There are issues with FCC public licensing to be certain, but the way a lot of stations deal with translators isn't quite above the board considering many stations attempt to follow the regulations (IMO).
    - 15457345234 3y ago
      How would that provide any sort of unique service to the local community? Anyone who wants to hear that dreck can presumably do so.
loeg 3y ago
Why would someone design a radio system this way (instead of independent signal to the FM) and what is the risk of running an FM station without rebroadcasting that lead to these rules?
- Kwpolska 3y ago
  And isn't AM sound quality worse?
  - dylan604 3y ago
    Stereo AM signals are (was?) a thing! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_stereo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_stereo
  - op00to 3y ago
    AM sound quality can be much better than FM. There are AM pirates that show up once in a while that have absolutely beautiful signals.
- Anotheroneagain 3y ago
  I suppose for safety reasons, as AM receivers can be easily improvised. (in some kind of critical situation)
denotational 3y ago
> Translators are a secondary service that must only rebroadcast their primary service. I must be missing something, because this seems an arbitrary rule that has no purpose except to increase the FCC’s licensing revenues by allowing them to charge more for “real” spectrum allocation that for a “translator” allocation.
- MichaelZuo 3y ago
  The US Code of federal regulations, Congressional records, and media reports from around the time of enactment are on the public record, why not take a look yourself to check if you are ‘missing something’?

Their FM station is a "translator" which listens to their AM station and rebroadcasts it. Translators are a secondary service that must only rebroadcast their primary service.

Brybry 3y ago

To add to this with sources: "Loss of primary station's signal. The translator must be set up to go off the air if the main station's signal is lost." [1] and cites regulations [2][3] [1] https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/fm-translators-and-boosters https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/fm-translators-and-boosters [2] https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-74/subpart-L/section-74.1234 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C... [3] https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-74/subpart-L/section-74.1263 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C...

Angostura 3y ago
Shame they can't set up 1 1-Watt transmitter on a poll to meet the regulations and then sent a direct feed to to the FM transmitter
- amelius 3y ago
  Shame they can't just retransmit an internet radio station they receive over satellite.
  - geerlingguy 3y ago
    The main purpose of translators is to give AM radio stations an avenue (at lower cost than an FM only license) to reach listeners on the FM band and have a more consistent signal throughout the day — but they only keep that privilege if they continue maintaining the AM broadcast facilities as the primary signal. There are issues with FCC public licensing to be certain, but the way a lot of stations deal with translators isn't quite above the board considering many stations attempt to follow the regulations (IMO).
  - 15457345234 3y ago
    How would that provide any sort of unique service to the local community? Anyone who wants to hear that dreck can presumably do so.

loeg 3y ago

Why would someone design a radio system this way (instead of independent signal to the FM) and what is the risk of running an FM station without rebroadcasting that lead to these rules?

Kwpolska 3y ago
And isn't AM sound quality worse?
- dylan604 3y ago
  Stereo AM signals are (was?) a thing! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_stereo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_stereo
- op00to 3y ago
  AM sound quality can be much better than FM. There are AM pirates that show up once in a while that have absolutely beautiful signals.
Anotheroneagain 3y ago
I suppose for safety reasons, as AM receivers can be easily improvised. (in some kind of critical situation)

denotational 3y ago

> Translators are a secondary service that must only rebroadcast their primary service. I must be missing something, because this seems an arbitrary rule that has no purpose except to increase the FCC’s licensing revenues by allowing them to charge more for “real” spectrum allocation that for a “translator” allocation.

MichaelZuo 3y ago
The US Code of federal regulations, Congressional records, and media reports from around the time of enactment are on the public record, why not take a look yourself to check if you are ‘missing something’?