2 ms·
Yes, and for nominally climate-driven reasons MA has constrained the construction of pipelines and other facilities that would allow the cheaper delivery of nat
by twoodfin 3y ago
Yes, and for nominally climate-driven reasons MA has constrained the construction of pipelines and other facilities that would allow the cheaper delivery of natural gas for cheaper electricity… thus discouraging consumers like me from moving to electrical utilities that would net reduce emissions.
- MajimasEyepatch 3y agoIt's probably more accurate to say the concerns are about the environment rather than climate per se. There's more to protecting than the environment than limiting carbon emissions. (I'm not saying they're right to make that tradeoff in this particular case.)
- Scoundreller 3y agoAnd you have Maine getting in the way of hydroelectricity from Quebec making its way over: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/hydro-quebec-1.6816752 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/hydro-quebec-1.68167... https://www.hydroquebec.com/projects/appalaches-maine-interconnection/ https://www.hydroquebec.com/projects/appalaches-maine-interc...