2 ms·
> just because some action isn't on the top 2, it isn't reason to stop doing it Since you don't quantify a cost-benefit of any action, how have you arrived to
by adolph 3y ago
> just because some action isn't on the top 2, it isn't reason to stop doing it
Since you don't quantify a cost-benefit of any action, how have you arrived to this effort ordinality?
Given a ranking, would any efforts in combination have higher impact than a higher ranked effort alone?
- marcosdumay 3y agoWell, I meant it by cost. The marginal costs for those top 2 are quite public. For electricity it's negative, electric cars cost some 30% more than normal ones. They are reasonably easy to estimate for things like spreading carbon-capturing rocks around (or you can use the price of phosphate-rich rocks, it should be similar). It's not a very expensive thing to do, but way more expensive than those 2. Marginally, there isn't a lot of synergy between those different options. But if you push them to levels much higher than the ones we have now it becomes clear that decarbonizing electricity will become a bottleneck to almost everything.