for sibling, as I'm over my post quota: https://imgur.com/a/l6nqhvX https://imgur.com/a/l6nqhvX Yeah, Vive -> Index -> Quest 2 -> Varjo Aero[^1] -> Quest 3 ->

for sibling, as I'm over my post quota: https://imgur.com/a/l6nqhvX https://imgur.com/a/l6nqhvX Yeah, Vive -> Index -> Quest 2 -> Varjo Aero[^1] -> Quest 3 -> Vision Pro. Yeah FOV is worse, yeah it costs more, virtually order of magnitude more. People are responding to "The quest 3 does essentially the same at roughly 10x lower price.", i.e. dismissal of there being a significant qualitative difference. I never, ever opted into watching video on any headset until now. Like, yeah, I tried it. I watched stuff. This is organic "I want to watch stuff, where's the VR headset?" instead of "here's a VR headset, I can watch stuff" Something that escaped me until a week ago was a good visualization of the pixel density. I thought the Aero was amazing. It is/was. I assumed Vision Pro was marginally more or less than the Aero. Actually, Aero::Vision Pro is roughly Vive 1::Aero. [^1] that one is important, that's real street cred, you know I care, invest, and know what I'm talking about